SafetyNewsAlert.com » Would workers be safer without PPE?

Would workers be safer without PPE?

November 13, 2009 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: Fatality, In this week's e-newsletter, Injuries, Latest News & Views, PPE (protective equipment), Safety training


Safety pros know that even the best safety gear doesn’t prevent worker injuries all by itself. But do workers know that? Do they feel their PPE makes them invincible?

Let’s use a sports analogy. A recent article in The Wall Street Journal asks the question, “Is it time to retire the football helmet?”

The reason behind the suggestion: While helmets reduce the chance of death on the field, they also create a sense of invulnerability that encourages football players to collide more forcefully and more often, according to the article. If they weren’t wearing helmets, they’d be less likely to have head-on collisions with other players.

And research shows that, in the cases of these football players, brain damage isn’t necessarily the result of any one trauma, but the accumulation of thousands of seemingly minor blows to the head.

No one is really suggesting the NFL do away with helmets.

What is being suggested is changing some of the rules of football to make head-on collisions among players less likely.

Now, let’s apply this to workplace safety.

Here’s one example: Will fall protection equipment absolutely prevent a worker’s injury or death if that person is taking too many risks while wearing the equipment? Of course not.

Safety pros know that, but some workers don’t get it. Here’s a message workers have to hear every so often: Safety gear doesn’t make you invincible. Avoiding injury also requires proper use of the PPE, employees sticking to safety rules, not taking unnecessary risks, etc.

One of the most effective ways to counter workers’ thoughts that they’re invincible is to show them how others have been injured at work. Invite someone who suffered a serious — and possibly debilitating — workplace injury to speak at a safety meeting. Ask the person to explain in detail how the injury has affected his or her life — how everyday activities can no longer be taken for granted.

How have you dealt with employees who feel an injury “won’t happen to me”? Let us know in the Comments Box below.

  • Share/Bookmark

SafetyNewsAlert.com delivers the latest Safety news once a week to the inboxes of over 270,000 Safety professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to SafetyNewsAlert!

Tags: , , ,


2 Responses to “Would workers be safer without PPE?”

  1. LEU Says:

    I don’t buy the idea that football helmets have created an invincibility mentality - it’s just the players have gotten so big, strong, and fast that they have exceeded the protection offered. Twenty years ago an NFL running back averaged just around 200 lbs. and linemen rarely exceeded 300 lbs. Now the running backs are averaging 230 and linemen rarely are BELOW 300. And all are much faster and stronger.
    With PPE - it should be used as a last resort. Companies are supposed to eliminate hazards through engineering controls or job hazard removal. I can’t think of any instance in 30 years that an employee felf “invincible” by wearing PPE. But I can think of numerous instances whereby the employee wasn’t trained properly on the hazards associated with the job. And that’s the key.

  2. FFC Says:

    LEU - it would be nice if PPE were only used as a last resort like you state, but some jobs - such as firefighting - PPE is the first line of defense. Sorry, but I’m not running into a building without my PPE because it’s supposed to be my “last resort”.


advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • Should OSHA be able to shut down a facility if it's found to be an imminent hazard?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement

    Recent Popular Articles