SafetyNewsAlert.com » OSHA’s new budget shows its upcoming priorities

OSHA’s new budget shows its upcoming priorities

February 20, 2012 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: Compliance, New rules and regulations, OSHA news, Special Report, Voluntary Protection Program


Will OSHA conduct more inspections in federal Fiscal Year 2013 (FY 2013)? Will there be new regulations? And how does the agency plan to fund compliance assistance to companies? President Obama’s budget proposal shows what’s ahead.

The overall budget for OSHA would remain almost the same at $565 million, only a 0.12% increase over this year’s funding.

However, there’s some significant shifting of funds proposed.

The FY 2013 proposed budget includes a 23.5% increase, including 37 new employees, for the 21 whistleblower protection programs administered by OSHA.

The increase is to reduce the backlog of whistleblower claims and prepare for a high volume of complex cases with recently passed laws involving health care reform, food safety and finance reform. The current administration, compared to the previous one, has also done more to encourage workers to come forward with whistleblower complaints.

Another significant increase (+5%) would go to standard development. OSHA says it will continue to develop its proposed Injury and Illness Prevention Program standard which would require companies to develop and implement comprehensive safety plans to find and fix hazards.

In FY 2013, OSHA projects it will issue four final rules: Walking and Working Surfaces, Modernization of Recordkeeping and two consensus standard updates. Work also continues on standards for combustible dust and beryllium. Those two standards aren’t expected in 2013.

Funds for federal enforcement programs remain basically flat with just a small decrease. Despite that, OSHA intends to increase the number of federal inspections slightly. Inspections in FY 2012 (ending Sept. 30) are projected to be up 4% over the previous year. OSHA plans 43,100 inspections in FY 2013, a 2% increase over 2012. In FY 2011, federal OSHA conducted 40,648 inspections.

Federal funds going to the 27 state OSHA programs would also remain unchanged.

Federal compliance assistance funds would drop 4.2% under the proposal. OSHA will no longer offer its Corporate and Merit Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) to new sites starting in FY 2013.The VPP Star program would continue with OSHA adding 60 new sites, a decrease from 100 new facilities in 2012.

VPP Corporate extended the program across a large scale for bigger corporations. VPP Merit was designed for employers that have demonstrated the potential and commitment to achieve Star status but that need to further improve their safety and health management system and/or injury and illness performance. OSHA gives a Merit Program participant specified Merit goals that it must meet in order to achieve Star status and continue within VPP.

The decrease in funding for assistance programs comes as no surprise. The current administration has said it wants to continue with a balance of enforcement and assistance programs, but the emphasis has been greater on enforcement.

One assistance program would maintain its current funding. The On-site Consultation Programs administered at the state level would receive the same funding in FY 2013 as they are this year.

Of course, this just reflects the Obama administration’s request for 2013 funding. The president’s entire proposed budget must receive Congressional approval. These plans would also be likely to change if the president is not reelected.

To sum it up, funds for whistleblower programs would go up, enforcement funding would stay the same but there would be 2% more inspections, and some compliance assistance funding would be cut. What do you think of this proposal? Let us know in the comments box below.

  • Share/Bookmark

SafetyNewsAlert.com delivers the latest Safety news once a week to the inboxes of over 270,000 Safety professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to SafetyNewsAlert!

Tags: , , , ,


7 Responses to “OSHA’s new budget shows its upcoming priorities”

  1. Andrea Says:

    I hope Obama is not reelected.

  2. Lori Welch Says:

    It is insulting to me that this administration apparently thinks all businesses are out to hurt their employees. What business doesn’t know that safe, uninjured employees improve the bottom line figures?
    I realize there are some bad eggs in the group, but it’s clear this administration thinks all employers are irresponsible and unsafe.

  3. Jorge Says:

    I agree with the two previous posts

  4. Safety Dave Says:

    More workers are killed on the job every year than at War! 4,547 workers died on the job in 2010!!!

    “With every one of these fatalities, the lives of a worker’s family members were shattered and forever changed. We can’t forget that fact.” -Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor

    14,000 workers were killed every year prior to OSHA! I’d say we are getting the best bang for our tax dollars when investing in OSHA! God Bless!

  5. alecfinn Says:

    Here we go again Its bad for business!@!!!!

    Right and letting folk get killed or injured is appropriate so long as there is a profit

    And No the Administration does not think “all employers are irresponsible and unsafe.” But there are many that are look at this site OSHA’s site The Chemical Safety Boards site. There are enough employers out there that are irresponsible and unsafe that these organizations are needed. Every human is like a work of art there never was one like that and there will never be another one. That needs to be protected. Just think of your family being affected by poor or nonexistent safety on the job.

    Safety Dave I agree I was working when OSHA first started and lived with someone who had severly damaged lungs (May they rest in peace) from chemical exposure at work.

    Obama is looking out for us poor slobs who are the ones that get overlooked or are discarded when we become damaged goods.

    People need to look at the history of labor as it relates to business and the human condition.

    Just as the posts were on the employee who was trampled to death at a Target on Black Friday (LI, NY) a while ago……..Target protested a OSHA fine because there were no OSHA guidelines for crowd control or for Black Friday and Target said the General Duty Clause did not apply to this ……..incident.

  6. Fred Hosier Says:

    Editor’s note: It was Wal-Mart that was fined for the Black Friday employee trampling. http://www.safetynewsalert.com/osha-sends-another-warning-about-black-friday-crowds/

  7. alecfinn Says:

    OOOPPPSSS

    Sorry Target

    Thank You Mr Hosier

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 14 + 3 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
 characters available

advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • At your company, is safety

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement

    Recent Popular Articles