SafetyNewsAlert.com » Governor vetoes bills to strengthen state’s OSHA

Governor vetoes bills to strengthen state’s OSHA

June 13, 2011 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: construction safety, Fatality, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, New rules and regulations, State OSHAs


One governor has thumbed his nose at federal OSHA’s suggestions for strengthening his state’s safety agency. This is the same state that had much to do with federal OSHA’s crackdown on state workplace safety programs.

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) has vetoed two bills that would have toughened the state’s workplace safety regulations. Sandoval said the regulations were burdensome to businesses.

AB 253 would have allowed Nevada’s OSHA to issue fines to employers that don’t live up to settlement agreements following safety inspections. Currently, the state has to sue businesses in civil court to enforce those agreements.

AB 254 would have allowed Nevada OSHA to issue a citation if an inspector finds any employee had access to a hazard. The bill would have clarified that an inspector wouldn’t have to see an employee near the hazard before issuing a citation.

Last fall, federal OSHA issued a report on 25 state and territorial workplace safety agencies.

The larger crackdown was prompted, in part, by the Las Vegas Sun’s 2009 Pulitzer Prize-winning series on construction worker deaths on that city’s Strip and the response by Nevada OSHA.

The two vetoed bills grew from federal OSHA’s suggestions on how the state could improve its workplace safety program.

Federal OSHA has promised more follow-ups on its monitoring and evaluation of the state safety agencies.

  • Share/Bookmark

SafetyNewsAlert.com delivers the latest Safety news once a week to the inboxes of over 270,000 Safety professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to SafetyNewsAlert!

Tags: , , ,


3 Responses to “Governor vetoes bills to strengthen state’s OSHA”

  1. Whattayamean Says:

    Gosh! A Republican governor voting for big business. Go figure.
    AB253 seems reasonable because it would strengthen employer accountability. I see that as a positive. AB254 is a little fuzzy. “Access to a hazard” seems vague and open-ended.

  2. alecfinn Says:

    I agree……….. But……. stranger things………Horatio

    Access to hazard?

    There are hazards all over………..vague and open-ended is an understatement…….

  3. alecfinn Says:

    The more I think about this the more it bothers me……..A governor curtailing a public safety monitoring organizations………….

    But of course the Governor is Republican……..How about we open the Government coffers and offer more untraceable bail-outs

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 2 + 12 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
 characters available

advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • Should OSHA be able to shut down a facility if it's found to be an imminent hazard?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement

    Recent Popular Articles