Are OSHA and unions paying more attention to worker fatigue?
May 11, 2011 by Fred HosierPosted in: fatigue, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, OSHA news, Transportation safety, What do you think?
Employers may face more restrictions in how they schedule workers now that unions and OSHA are paying more attention to employee fatigue.
Unions are increasingly negotiating work hours, according to participants in a meeting recently sponsored by the Greater Houston Labor and Employment Relations Association.
Example: Employees at Dow Chemical in Freeport, TX, recently negotiated a fatigue standard in their new labor contract. Under the new agreement:
- employees who work three consecutive 16-hour days must receive a 24-hour break, and
- employees on regular shifts must get a 48-hour break if they work 21 days in a row.
A Dow representative says the purpose of the policy is to make sure the safety of employees, facilities and the community aren’t adversely affected because of fatigue caused by excessive work hours.
A union representative at the Houston meeting said one reason why worker fatigue isn’t addressed more is because OSHA doesn’t have a fatigue standard and it hasn’t used the General Duty Clause to penalize companies who require employees to work until they’re fatigued.
OSHA disagrees. In a statement to the Houston Chronicle, the agency said, “OSHA is very concerned about workplace fatigue and the effect it can have on workplace safety. We are prepared to cite employers when we discover situations in which the health and safety of workers is put at risk because of long hours.”
Continental Airlines allows pilots to call in and report they’re too fatigued to fly. Continental’s director for labor relations, Jocelyn LaBove, said some of the responsibility to stay rested lies with individual employees.
What’s the best way for companies to make sure their employees aren’t too tired to work safely? Let us know what you think in the Comments Box below.
SafetyNewsAlert.com delivers the latest Safety news once a week to the inboxes of over 270,000 Safety professionals.
Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to SafetyNewsAlert!
Tags: Continental Airlines, Dow Chemical, General Duty Clause, schedule workers, unions, worker fatigue

May 24th, 2011 at 10:27 am
They should have a comprehensive fatique policy including how many hours and days an individual may work without a rest, break or days off. The amount time worked and time off should be specified. The number of consecutive hours and days worked should take into account the amount of mental and physical exertion involved. How intense and focused. How physically demanding. How environmentally stressful. I.E. working in extreme heat, cold or wet conditions as an example of environmentally stressful. This is not rocket science. It is common sense. If a person is fatiqued they will make mistakes, either mental or physical and it could cause harm to themselves or someone else. So why would you go there. Take time and review your working conditions, processes and procedures and implement a policy - the union or osha shouldn’t have to force a company to do this. They should do it as a matter of good business practice.
June 28th, 2011 at 10:13 am
There is no doubt that a standard is needed with guidelines designed to curb fatigue accidents. Unfortunately, with most employers it is “Goods & Services” first, safety second. I know it is still hard to believe in this day and age, but it’s true. When that aircraft has to go just one more trip tonight, or that tractor-trailer needs to be on the coast tomorrow morning, or the crab boat captain says ” we are going to pull 100 pots for the next 36 hours, fatigue is a big factor, but ignored for the sake of the all important dollar. Do we need and OSHA standard? You Bet!