SafetyNewsAlert.com » Obama’s latest pick again signals increased regulation

Obama’s latest pick again signals increased regulation

July 22, 2009 by Jim Burger
Posted in: In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Safety vs. production, enforcement

No contrast between the Bush administration and the Obama administration is more stark than the dramatically different signals they’ve sent in selecting nominees to head federal safety and labor agencies.

A Wall Street Journal article discusses the backgrounds of some of the selections.

President Obama’s latest choice, Joseph Main to oversee the Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), continues a strong trend toward choosing labor over management and increased regulation over the Bush administration’s more hands-off approach.

Main was for many years a union official and mine-safety advocate. He began his career working in coal mines.

If approved, he’ll join Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, who had a well-documented pro-union background, and temporary OSHA head Jordan Barab, who previously worked for the AFL-CIO and who was fiercely critical of Bush’s labor policies.

In contrast, previous Labor Secretary Elaine Chao worked for Citicorp and BankAmerica and was considered anti-regulation and a staunch ally of business. Previous OSHA head Edwin Foulke Jr. was a management-side labor lawyer.

Main would be the first confirmed head of MSHA since 2004. Richard Stickler, who filled the post under President Bush, was a controversial former Bethlehem Steel executive who was installed as a recess appointment after failing to win approval from the Senate.

Mining-association groups say they expect Main, if approved, to be tough. But, they add, they know him and can work with him.

He may have his work cut out for him. Public Citizen, a consumer-advocacy group, says the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission has a backlog of 13,000 mine-safety disputes.

What do you expect from President Obama’s nominees? Let us know in the Comments Box below.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,


advertisement

One Response to “Obama’s latest pick again signals increased regulation”

  1. Tim Hudson Says:

    First and foremost, Obama is a thug-socialist that wants the coal mining industry put out of business all together and these appointees have the same agenda. None of his appointees are pro-business and if they ever worked in the private sector it was in a profit sucking overhead position. As a previous business owner in a heavily regulated industry and now a safety professional employeed by a construction materials company, I see nothing but headaches ahead. We can never make this administration happy while staying profitable with 30+ Zar’s in the background.

    You see, these poeple can never really tell us who they are or what they truely believe. They would never get elected if they did. As Obama say in California to all this big donors, “you haven’t seen nothin yet.”

    The people inside MSHA and OSHA are individuals that can’t and couldn’t make it in the private sector, so they take jobs where they know they aren’t held accountable for their exagerated, ingnorant and false write-ups. These two organizations are turning into jackboot nazi’s.

    I wonder what the AFL-CIO is going to tell their membership when there are no businesses left for the workers?

Leave a Reply


advertisement

Recent Popular Articles




    Quick Vote

    • Who's most likely to break safety rules at your facility?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement