SafetyNewsAlert.comUndocumented workers can't return to U.S., but they can sue former employer » Safety News Alert

Undocumented workers can’t return to U.S., but they can sue former employer

July 5, 2012 by Jim Burger
Posted in: In this week's e-newsletter, Injuries, Latest News & Views, Uncategorized, Workers' comp


Nine undocumented workers who were injured in a propane explosion at a New York farm camp will have their day in a U.S. court — even though they’ll have to have it by video conference from their homes in Mexico and Guatemala.

A New York appeals court has given the workers the go-ahead to press their lawsuit from their home countries, according to the (Syracuse, NY) Post-Standard.

The explosion happened in Oswego County nearly seven years ago, killing one worker and severely wounding the others. The survivors sued the farm, the propane delivery company and the maker of the stove.

All 10 had given the farm owner, Anthony DeMarco & Sons Inc., forged passports and Social Security cards.

The explosion happened at dawn. The stove had failed a health department inspection a few weeks before.

As seasonal workers, they were putting in 60-hour weeks and being paid $6.25 an hour, according to their lawyer, Michael Bersani. It happened in October, near the end of the season, and the workers also lost thousands of dollars in cash.

Though they weren’t legally in the country, they were covered by workers’ comp, which paid over $1 million in medical expenses.

All also received comp for lost wages. Eight took settlements averaging $40,000 and returned to their home countries.

One who remains in the U.S. gets a workers’ comp check for about $200, every two weeks.

They filed their lawsuit in 2008.

Last August, a state Supreme Court judge denied a motion to let them testify from their home countries, saying they had to return to the U.S. for depositions and independent medical examinations, if they were requested by defendants.

Two applied for visas to re-enter the U.S. and were denied.

The appeals court unanimously agreed that they should be allowed to testify by video.

Sound policy?

The  judges said their right to sue and to testify from their home countries supports “sound public policy.”  To do otherwise would “reward employers who knowingly disregard the employment verification systems in defiance of the primary purposes of federal immigration laws.”

The controversy underscores the conflict between employers who may seek out undocumented workers, or at least turn a blind eye, and immigration officials and hard-liners.

“Everyone knows that a lot of them don’t have documentation,” Bersani said. “You ask any farmer, they’ll tell you, for the pay that these guys get and the conditions these guys work in, you can’t find Americans to do those jobs.”

Should the workers be allowed to sue and testify? Tell us what you think in the comment box below.

 

Share

The Safety Insights You Need
Get the latest safety news, trends, and insights - delivered weekly.


Join over 334,000 safety pros:

Privacy policy

  • http://www.samcowholesalesales.com Damon

    I don’t think they should have been compensated!!!

  • http://www.samcowholesalesales.com Damon

    I lost my home in a propane fire.

    As for the illegals getting compensation, I say nay.

  • Jason B

    This one is right up there with the burlgar that fell through a skylight and then sued the homeowner. Ridiculous.

    No one should be awarded anything if it was only made possible by breaking the law in the first place!

  • Julie

    The important thing to note is “for the pay and working conditions” (sec) cited from above that no Americans would work those jobs. Knowingly having anyone work with failed equipment especially capable of explosion, unacceptable. In addition to that these folks did not receive anything other than the hourly rate, no overtime or benefits. Who is really committing a crime here? The employer is totally responsible. Why should the fact that these folks were not legal ease the application of the law, also these folks have not been entitled to anything that a legal person would have, and that is the risk that the employer agreed to along with the illegal workers. Substandard working conditions, the human condition is fragile illegal or not, it should be a lesson and then hiring illegal immigrants would be a less desirable and acceptable practice.

  • rich

    Well- it appears that being illegal is fine no matter what-CRIME PAYS here? Fine the company but Y do we allow the country to support illegal contracts and events? sickening- fine the company and let their money support the forces that enforce the law and legal system-let the company pay the fine-not the insurer. CRAZY system if our insurers and taxpayers are supporting illegal ANYTHING. A contract that is not legal in a clause or event means contract is not voided-same with workers-the company should pay-no one else-


advertisement



advertisement

Recent Popular Articles