<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safety News Alert &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com</link>
	<description>OSHA and safety news for workplace safety professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Company that bashed OSHA on YouTube ordered to pay $42K for contempt</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new court decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All-Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=14071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Companies have the right to require OSHA to get a warrant before allowing a safety and health inspection. But once OSHA has a warrant, continuing to prevent an inspection can be costly. A court has ordered a Galva, IL, pet food production and packaging facility to pay almost $42,000 in fines for contempt and attorney&#8217;s [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt/">Company that bashed OSHA on YouTube ordered to pay $42K for contempt</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies have the right to require OSHA to get a warrant before allowing a safety and health inspection. But once OSHA has a warrant, continuing to prevent an inspection can be costly. <span id="more-14071"></span></p>
<p>A <a title="court opinion via Google Scholar" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14292956071446583563&amp;q=OSHA+v.+All-Feed+Processing+and+Packaging&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,39" target="_blank">court has ordered</a> a Galva, IL, pet food production and packaging facility to pay almost $42,000 in fines for contempt and attorney&#8217;s fees in a dispute with OSHA.</p>
<p>On May 3, 2011, OSHA sought and received a warrant to inspect the All-Feed Processing and Packaging facility. OSHA wanted to conduct an inspection after receiving employee complaints of hazardous working conditions including excessive dust and noise. All-Feed had blocked two inspections in April 2011.</p>
<p>OSHA presented its warrant to All-Feed on May 4, 2011, and started an inspection. However, All-Feed refused to allow OSHA to finish the inspection by conducting representative personal samplings as authorized in the warrant.</p>
<p>The case eventually wound up in U.S. District Court, which found All-Feed to be in civil contempt.</p>
<p>OSHA wanted $500/day fines from May 4, 2011, until an inspection was eventually completed on Aug. 26, 2011.</p>
<p>All-Feed argued that it had agreed to an OSHA inspection on July 5, 2011. The court agreed with that, saying part of the reason the inspection wasn&#8217;t completed until Aug. 26 was because of delays on OSHA&#8217;s part. So the contempt period was limited to the 62 days between May 4 and July 5. At $500/day, the fine comes to $31,000.</p>
<p>The court also ordered All-Feed to pay $10,964.95 for OSHA&#8217;s attorneys&#8217; fees.</p>
<p>The Aug. 26 <a title="Failed to protect workers from dust and noise: $758K fine" href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/failed-to-protect-workers-from-dust-and-noise-758k-fine/" target="_blank">inspection resulted in $758,400 in fines</a> against All-Feed, primarily for dust and noise violations. That matter is still unresolved.</p>
<p>The company has been inspected 11 times since 2000, with OSHA finding more than 70 violations.</p>
<p>All-Feed also posted videos on YouTube calling OSHA the &#8220;oppression of American business.&#8221;</p>
<p>The company took down the YouTube videos, but its own <a title="allfeed.com" href="http://www.allfeed.com/osha.htm" target="_blank">website still states </a>that OSHA &#8220;has been knocking on our door consistently for the better part of the last decade, harassing and falsely accusing us of providing a &#8216;dangerous workplace.&#8217; They have fined us beyond any reasonable measure.&#8221;</p>
<p>The web post goes on to call the OSHA fines against All-Feed &#8220;cruel and unusual,&#8221; and says the agency is &#8220;bullying us into submission without any cause or justification.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many attorneys who represent companies in legal disputes with OSHA advise employers to be ready for OSHA inspections and not refuse an inspector to enter. Reason: Why start off on a bad foot with an agency that has the ability to fine you up to $70,000 for each violation?</p>
<p>Do you think it was a bad idea for All-Feed to refuse the inspection? Let us know what you think in the comments below.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt/">Company that bashed OSHA on YouTube ordered to pay $42K for contempt</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/company-that-bashed-osha-on-youtube-ordered-to-pay-42k-for-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Facebook help uncover workers&#8217; comp fraud?</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=12637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Insurance companies have a new tool to catch workers trying to commit workers&#8217; comp fraud, and it&#8217;s as close as a computer screen.  Insurers are increasingly using Facebook and other social media to find evidence that could lead to denial of workers&#8217; comp benefits. That word comes from the law firm of Ingerman &#38; Horwitz, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud/">Will Facebook help uncover workers&#8217; comp fraud?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurance companies have a new tool to catch workers trying to commit workers&#8217; comp fraud, and it&#8217;s as close as a computer screen. <span id="more-12637"></span></p>
<p>Insurers are increasingly using Facebook and other social media to find evidence that could lead to denial of workers&#8217; comp benefits.</p>
<p>That word comes from the law firm of Ingerman &amp; Horwitz, which is <a title="Social media sites like Facebook being used to spy on injured workers" href="http://www.examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/social-media-sites-like-facebook-being-used-to-spy-on-injured-workers" target="_blank">warning its clients</a> who are injured workers that things they post on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, YouTube or elsewhere on the web could work against them.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are seeing an increasing number of cases where insurance companies and their lawyers are searching social media sites &#8230; for photos and blogs about what our clients are doing while they are recovering from their injuries,&#8221; says Alan Horwitz, co-founder of the firm.</p>
<p>Courts are even ordering injured workers to produce their Facebook or other social media pages for inspection by insurance company lawyers.</p>
<p>&#8220;In one current case, our client&#8217;s Workers&#8217; Compensation benefits were stopped by the insurance company when their lawyers discovered he was selling personal items daily on Craigslist and eBay,&#8221; says the firm&#8217;s Bruce Ingerman. &#8220;The insurance company considered that he was earning income and therefore was no longer eligible for workers&#8217; compensation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ingerman and Horwitz see this as a bad development. &#8220;The devil could indeed be lurking in the details one chooses to post online.&#8221;</p>
<p>But this could be a good development for employers. Insurance companies used to send investigators to videotape injured workers who appeared to be not-quite-so-injured when they thought no one was looking.</p>
<p>Now, the injured workers can save the insurance companies from having to videotape anything. Their Facebook pages can show <a title="Will employee’s Facebook page end his injury lawsuit?" href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com./will-employees-facebook-page-end-his-workplace-injury-lawsuit/" target="_blank">just how injured they are</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud/">Will Facebook help uncover workers&#8217; comp fraud?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/will-facebook-help-uncover-workers-comp-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Man nearly saws his face off while TV camera records</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety video/photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chainsaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[close call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=12526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s great video for any TV reporter: Record your narration (what they call a &#8220;stand-up&#8221;) while work crews clear away storm debris in the background. But this TV reporter probably never expected to capture this on video:  A worker removing a tree stump tripped and nearly fell onto his chainsaw. The close call was [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records/">Video: Man nearly saws his face off while TV camera records</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s great video for any TV reporter: Record your narration (what they call a &#8220;stand-up&#8221;) while work crews clear away storm debris in the background. But this TV reporter probably never expected to capture this on video: <span id="more-12526"></span></p>
<p>A worker removing a tree stump tripped and nearly fell onto his chainsaw. The <a title="NEWS BLOOPER: Man Nearly Saws His Face During My Stand-up" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31khLebxCyg" target="_blank">close call was captured by the reporter&#8217;s camera</a> and has been posted on YouTube.</p>
<p>WTVW, Evansville, IN, reporter Drew Gardner says, &#8220;A man standing behind me has a dangerously close call with a chainsaw during my storm coverage in Southern Illinois.&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems the worker could have used <a title="Chain Saw Safety Tips" href="http://www.osha.gov/Publications/3269-10N-05-english-06-27-2007.html" target="_blank">OSHA&#8217;s Chain Saw Safety Tips Quick Card</a>, which includes advice for workers, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Shut off the saw or engage its chain brake when carrying the saw on rough or uneven terrain, and</li>
<li>Keep your hands on the saw’s handles, and maintain secure footing while operating the saw.</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records/">Video: Man nearly saws his face off while TV camera records</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com">Safety News Alert</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/video-man-nearly-saws-his-face-off-while-tv-camera-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
