<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SafetyNewsAlert.com &#187; top 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tag/top-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com</link>
	<description>Occupational safety and health news for workplace safety professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top 10 OSHA fines of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top-10 list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire/explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=5863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In the first year of the Obama administration, OSHA was busy handing out fines the likes of which hadn&#8217;t been seen for eight years. Here&#8217;s our rundown of 10 significant fines from the last 12 months, and what they mean for businesses: 

OSHA issues largest fine ever: $87.4 million to BP. This fine demonstrates OSHA&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5342" title="topten" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/topten.jpg" alt="topten" width="347" height="346" /></p>
<p>In the first year of the Obama administration, OSHA was busy handing out fines the likes of which hadn&#8217;t been seen for eight years. Here&#8217;s our rundown of 10 significant fines from the last 12 months, and what they mean for businesses: <span id="more-5863"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>OSHA issues largest fine ever: $87.4 million to BP. </strong>This fine demonstrates OSHA&#8217;s intent to check up on companies once they&#8217;ve made serious safety mistakes. The agency evaluated BP&#8217;s progress after the 2005 fire and explosion that killed 15 people and injured 170 more at its Texas City, TX refinery. OSHA issued 270 &#8220;notifications of failure to abate&#8221; and identified 439 new willful violations at the plant.</li>
<li><strong>Two executives face prison time and huge fines in deaths of five workers. </strong>Phillipe Goutagny and James Thompson, executives with RPI Coating, each face 2.5 years in prison and a fine up to $1.25 million if convicted. On Oct. 2, 2007, vapor from a solvent ignited inside a tunnel at a hydroelectric plant in Colorado. Workers survived the blast but were overcome by smoke and fumes and died of asphyxiation. OSHA says it will work more closely with the Justice Department in cases like these to bring criminal charges against executives with penalties that include prison time.</li>
<li><strong>OSHA wastes no time in using new per-employee citations, issues $1.2 million fine. </strong>G.S. Robbins &amp; Co. of St. Louis, MO, was hit with 21 egregious willful citations for hazardous chemical handling. Each citation was on a per-instance basis. Even during this period of difficult economic recovery, OSHA won&#8217;t hesitate to use per-instance, per-employee fines to hike total fine amounts. This wasn&#8217;t the only instance in which OSHA used per-instance citations in 2009 (see item #7 below).</li>
<li><strong>Company hit with $1.14 million fine following employee complaint. </strong>Are the big fines relegated only to incidents involving deaths or multiple serious injuries? Hardly. OSHA began a December 2008 inspection at Milk Specialties in Whitehall, WI, in response to an employee complaint. Willful citations were issued for the employer&#8217;s failure to comply with OSHA&#8217;s confined space and lockout/tagout regulations. OSHA is taking employee complaints seriously.</li>
<li><strong>After two similar incidents, owner and manager go to jail. </strong>ANC Roofing of Santa Rosa, CA, owner Kenneth Alton pleaded no contest to failing to protect employees from a hazard. He was sentenced to nine months in jail and a $248,000 fine. Supervisor Robert McAfee pleaded no contest to one misdemeanor violation and was sentenced to 30 days in jail. On May 11, 2006, an ANC employee backed into an unguarded skylight and fell 21 feet to his death. Four months later, another ANC employee suffered major head trauma when he fell 19 feet from an unprotected skylight.</li>
<li><strong>OSHA fines Wal-Mart $7,000 for worker trampling incident. </strong>A Wal-Mart worker was trampled to death by a crowd of 2,000 shoppers on the day after Thanksgiving in 2008. OSHA said Wal-Mart should have recognized that its employees were exposed to being crushed by the crowd based on previous experience. Wal-Mart fought the fine. OSHA used the General Duty Clause to issue the fine and has said it will use the GDC in similar situations where safety was compromised but a specific regulation wasn&#8217;t violated.</li>
<li><strong>Company faces $1.09 million OSHA fine for 202 willful violations. </strong>OSHA didn&#8217;t really need anyone&#8217;s permission to start issuing per-instance fines (see item #3 above), but it got the go-ahead in the form of a decision from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC). The appeals panel ruled OSHA properly cited Smalis Painting Co. on a per-employee basis for violations of the lead-in-construction regulations, in connection with a project near Pittsburgh, PA. OSHA monitored six Smalis employees for lead exposure. Based on that data, OSHA issued violations for all employees who would have been exposed to the same hazards.</li>
<li><strong>OSHA is getting companies to agree to implement safety and health improvements above what&#8217;s required by regulations. </strong>A-1 Excavating of Bloomer, WI, agreed to make numerous changes in its work processes in exchange for lowering fines from almost $900,000 to $470,000. A-1 has to hire a full-time safety director, develop and implement site-specific safety and health plans for all major projects, identify all job sites to OSHA before work begins for the next three years, reduce the salary of job superintendents and project managers who fail to comply with OSHA requirements, and retain a third-party safety consultant.</li>
<li><strong>Cintas agrees to pay $3 million in fines and to comply with other conditions. </strong>In some cases, it hasn&#8217;t been an either-or situation between fines and strict safety improvements. After a worker was killed when he fell onto an unguarded conveyor and was dragged into a 300-degree industrial dryer, Cintas agreed to the huge fine <span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> to retain a team of independent experts to develop permanent fixes and review interim controls. Cintas also agreed to hire additional safety staff, conduct more frequent internal safety inspections, and establish new systems to examine employee complaints.</li>
<li><strong>A construction company agrees to pay $750,000 in fines and cut the pay of unsafe supervisors. </strong>Broadway Concrete of New York, NY, agreed to reduce the salaries of senior job superintendents who failed to comply with job safety practices. Broadway also agreed to hire a full-time corporate safety director, develop a new corporate safety plan, and provide OSHA with information on major projects and access to all job sites for the next four years.</li>
</ol>
<p>What do you think of OSHA&#8217;s recent enforcement tactics? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5863&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Safety Stories of 2009!</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top-10 list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting while driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' comp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=5341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sickening perfume, bowling injuries, texting while driving and snack machines that cause injuries. These are just some of the topics in our Safety News Alert Top 10 stories of 2009, determined by what readers clicked on the most. 

Co-worker’s perfume made her sick: Is company liable?
Company takes ‘em bowling, then pays big for comp
Texting while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5342" title="topten" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/topten.jpg" alt="topten" width="347" height="346" /></p>
<p>Sickening perfume, bowling injuries, texting while driving and snack machines that cause injuries. These are just some of the topics in our <em>Safety News Alert</em> Top 10 stories of 2009, determined by what readers clicked on the most. <span id="more-5341"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/co-workers-perfume-made-her-sick-is-company-liable/" target="_blank">Co-worker’s perfume made her sick: Is company liable?</a></li>
<li><a href=" http://www.safetynewsalert.com/employee-gets-workers-comp-for-bowling-injury/" target="_blank">Company takes ‘em bowling, then pays big for comp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/texting-while-driving-take-this-test/" target="_blank">Texting while driving: Take this test</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/would-this-video-get-people-to-stop-texting-and-driving/" target="_blank">Will violent, bloody video stop people from texting and driving?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-attacked-by-snack-machine-sues-for-comp/" target="_blank">Worker attacked by snack machine sues for comp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/employer-surveillance-harmed-employee-court-awards-1-million/" target="_blank">Employer surveillance ‘harmed’ employee, says court</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/forget-talking-on-a-cell-phone-these-workers-arent-allowed-to-carry-them/" target="_blank">Cell phone bans to reach new levels for safety?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/photo-shows-why-its-a-bad-idea-to-talk-or-text-and-drive/" target="_blank">Photo shows why it’s a bad idea to talk or text and drive</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/obama-bans-texting-while-driving/" target="_blank">Obama bans texting while driving</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/fired-employee-sues-says-co-worker-tried-to-punch-him/" target="_blank">Fired employee sues, says co-worker tried to punch him</a></li>
</ol>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5341&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 safety stories of 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alcohol/drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPE (protective equipment)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research on safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worker health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New regulations; accidents with multiple fatalities; the President-elect&#8217;s take on what OSHA should be doing. What is the top safety story of 2008? 
We polled our editors of safety publications at Progressive Business and came up with this list:
10. More research on dangers of nano-particles to exposed employees. Among the new studies, one that showed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New regulations; accidents with multiple fatalities; the President-elect&#8217;s take on what OSHA should be doing. What is the top safety story of 2008? <span id="more-717"></span></p>
<p>We polled our editors of safety publications at Progressive Business and came up with this list:</p>
<p>10. More research on dangers of nano-particles to exposed employees. Among the new studies, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v3/n7/abs/nnano.2008.111.html">one</a> that showed long, thin carbon nanotubes exhibited the same effects as long, thin asbestos fibers when injected into mice.</p>
<p>9. The National Institutes of Health says the superbug methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/mrsa/">no longer limited to hospitals</a>. Outbreaks of one strain &#8212; community-associated MRSA &#8212; have turned up in athletes, prison inmates, the military, daycare attendees and those who live in communal conditions such as college dormitories.</p>
<p>8. MSHA proposes and enacts a flurry of new mining rules in the wake of previous years&#8217; mining disasters, such as Crandall Canyon, including: a policy <a href="http://www.msha.gov/regs/complian/ppls/2008/PPL08-V-2.asp">letter</a> on underground communication and tracking devices; a new final rule that increases the pounds per square inch that pressure seals must withstand in an explosion; a proposal to test miners for drugs and alcohol; and a final <a href="http://www.msha.gov/REGS/FEDREG/FINAL/2008finl/E8-21449.asp">rule</a> requiring additional safety equipment for rescue teams at underground mines.</p>
<p>7. California gets serious with heat stress on the job. The company that hired a pregnant teen who died of heat stroke this spring after working in a vineyard without enough shade or water was hit with the highest fine ever issued to a farming operation in the state. Merced Farm Labor&#8217;s license was also revoked until Aug. 24, 2011 after the death of Maria Jimenez.</p>
<p>6. The employer payment for most types of PPE rule takes effect. OSHA started enforcing the new rule May 15, 2008. The only exceptions: non-specialty safety-toe protective footwear; shoes or boots with built-in metatarsal protection requested by an employee; logging boots; and everyday work or ordinary clothing used solely for protection from weather.</p>
<p>5. An explosion at an Imperial Sugar Refinery near Savannah, GA, kills 14 people and injures dozens more. The blast destroyed a packaging plant. The cause, ignition of dust, placed an emphasis on workplace ignitable dust hazards.</p>
<p>4. Amendment to the Americans with Disabilities Act to place burden on employers. The revision may dramatically increase the number of employees who can legally qualify as disabled. Action step for employers and those in charge of safety: Instead of an open-ended light-duty assignment that might define a worker as disabled, re-assess the returning worker&#8217;s condition every two weeks.</p>
<p>3. Distracted drivers prove fatal and costly. A Sept. 12 <a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_metrolink13.414d95e.html?npc">collision</a> between two trains in California killed 25 people. The National Transportation Safety Board is still investigating, but preliminary information shows the locomotive engineer of one train was using his cell phone to text within 30 seconds of the accident. In the wake of the crash, the Federal Railroad Administration enacted a new rule banning railroad employees from using cell phones (except in emergencies) and other electronic devices on the job. In another case, International Paper Co. agreed to pay $5.2 million to <a href="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/11312/international-paper-cell-phone-crash.html">settle</a> a personal injury lawsuit after one of its employees used her cell phone while driving for work. The employee hit another car, and its driver had to have an arm amputated as a result.</p>
<p>2. Now OSHA can multiply PPE and training fines by the number of employees. Under a <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29122.htm">new rule</a>, OSHA can issue per-employee citations for those types of violations starting Jan. 12, 2009.</p>
<p>1. President-elect Barack Obama promises an &#8220;invigorated&#8221; OSHA. Obama supported the Protecting America’s Workers Act as a Senator. The <a href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/time-to-boost-osha-fines-for-deaths-and-injuries/">bill</a> would increase OSHA penalties. Obama has also called on OSHA to issue standards &#8220;in a timely and more effective manner.&#8221; While the financial crisis may delay some reforms the new administration may want, some changes can be made by just shifting existing funding.</p>
<p>Vote for your top safety story or nominate one of your own in the Comments Box below.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=717&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-safety-stories-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-09-03 13:03:24 -->