<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SafetyNewsAlert.com &#187; Georgia-Pacific</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tag/georgia-pacific/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com</link>
	<description>Occupational safety and health news for workplace safety professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Was he fired for safety violation or racial discrimination?</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/was-he-fired-for-safety-violation-or-racial-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/was-he-fired-for-safety-violation-or-racial-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockout/tagout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new court decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fired for safety violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Have you ever fired someone for violating a company safety rule? In this case, a company did just that and then found itself in court on a charge of racial discrimination. 
Georgia-Pacific fired supervisor Ezra Brady for instructing an employee to use an improper lockout procedure. The plant manager claimed the result was that an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-81" title="lockout-tagout2" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/lockout-tagout2.jpg" alt="lockout-tagout2" width="360" height="279" /></p>
<p>Have you ever fired someone for violating a company safety rule? In this case, a company did just that and then found itself in court on a charge of racial discrimination. <span id="more-3497"></span></p>
<p>Georgia-Pacific fired supervisor Ezra Brady for instructing an employee to use an improper lockout procedure. The plant manager claimed the result was that an energy source wasn&#8217;t isolated and employees were at risk. The company said Brady willfully violated company policy.</p>
<p>The company had safety rules in its employee handbook that spelled out lockout requirements.</p>
<p>Brady filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that he&#8217;d been fired as a result of racial discrimination. Brady says he was fired for a first offense, while two white employees were only suspended for three days for the same offense.</p>
<p>When the EEOC found reasonable cause that Georgia-Pacific had racially discriminated against him, Brady filed a lawsuit against the company. G-P asked to have the case thrown out.</p>
<p>The court agreed to throw out Brady&#8217;s lawsuit because he didn&#8217;t prove that his employer gave preferential treatment to another employee under nearly identical circumstances.</p>
<p>In one situation in which a white employee was suspended, the worker was making repairs on a conveyor and reached far enough into it to have required a lock-out. The plant manager said this employee was only suspended for three days because he didn&#8217;t put any other employees in danger. The court found this didn&#8217;t qualify as a nearly identical circumstance.</p>
<p>In the second case, a manager and two other employees were conducting an inspection. One employee turned off a breaker to a machine. None of the three had a lock for the breaker, and the manager decided one wasn&#8217;t needed because he was supervising the situation. That manager also received a three-day suspension. Management said this case was not a willful violation of company policy because the manager thought he was doing the right thing. Once again, the court said this didn&#8217;t qualify as a nearly identical circumstance.</p>
<p>The take-home: Companies can enforce policies that call for firing employees for certain safety infractions. They just need to be careful that disciplinary measures are applied equally.</p>
<p>What does your company policy say about penalties for safety violations? Has your company ever fired someone for safety reasons? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3497&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/was-he-fired-for-safety-violation-or-racial-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/16 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp05.pbp.com @ 2010-03-22 00:26:31 -->