Safety and OSHA News

OSHA targets companies that punish employees for reporting injuries

OSHA has proposed making it easier to take action against companies that discourage employees from reporting injuries. 

Last fall, OSHA proposed a rule to make some changes to the way employee injuries are tracked and reported:

  • Employers would have to submit their reports electronically, and
  • These records would be made available on OSHA’s website.

During public meetings held on the subject in January, participants expressed concerns that posting the reports for companies online might cause employers to under-record injuries. One way that could happen: Employers could discourage injury reports from employees.

As a result, OSHA has extended the comment period on its proposal. The agency has also proposed new provisions to counter the concerns about under-reporting of injuries. OSHA proposes to:

  • require that employers inform employees of their right to report injuries
  • require injury reporting to be done in a way that isn’t “unduly burdensome,” and
  • prohibit employers from taking adverse action against employees for reporting injuries.

The third proposal is a potential biggie.

Currently, OSHA can’t take action against an employer unless an employee files a complaint about retaliation for reporting an injury.

Under the new proposal, OSHA would be able to cite an employer for taking adverse action against an employee for reporting an injury even if the employee didn’t file a complaint. That action could include fines and an abatement order.

What counts as ‘unduly burdensome?’

OSHA wonders whether some company policies might discourage employees from reporting injuries. Examples:

  • if the employer penalizes employees for failing to report an injury within a specific time period even if the employees didn’t realize they were injured at the time
  • reporting procedures that are too cumbersome (lots of paperwork to fill out)
  • requiring an employee who reported an injury to undergo drug testing where there was no reason to suspect drug use, and
  • only enforcing certain safety rules for employees who are injured.
Print Friendly

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest safety news and insights delivered to your inbox.

Comments

  1. Soloman Grundy says:

    It really happened. An employee got fired. Never got injured on the job. Three months later, the company filed a false Employers Report with the WC carrier, falsely reporting that the ex-employee was injured on the last day of work.

    Not a coincidence, that this false Report was filed right after the ex-employee filed a claim of discrimination and harassment. I think OSHA should look into this, too.

Speak Your Mind

*