<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit filed to force state to enact and enforce new heat stress rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lawsuit-filed-to-force-state-to-enact-and-enforce-new-heat-stress-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lawsuit-filed-to-force-state-to-enact-and-enforce-new-heat-stress-rules/</link>
	<description>Occupational safety and health news for workplace safety professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:23:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lawsuit-filed-to-force-state-to-enact-and-enforce-new-heat-stress-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6615</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3432#comment-6615</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from the ACLU?  They&#039;re certainly not pro-business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from the ACLU?  They&#8217;re certainly not pro-business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ria</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lawsuit-filed-to-force-state-to-enact-and-enforce-new-heat-stress-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3432#comment-5729</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think allowing OSHA to handle heat stress under the General Duty Clause is enough. At the same time, I commend California and Washington for going a step above. What I see wrong with this scenario is that the United Farm Workers Union needs to take responsibility for its workers, rather than suing California to do so. 

The union collects union dues and is supposed to represent the best interests of its members. The union under its own set of responsibilities should know if unsafe conditions exist for its members and then report those conditions to the appropriate agency such as Cal-OSHA. This would make it easier for Cal-OSHA to best appropriate the resources it has. Everyone is struggling in this economy, and expecting Cal-OSHA to hire more staff is not feasible right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think allowing OSHA to handle heat stress under the General Duty Clause is enough. At the same time, I commend California and Washington for going a step above. What I see wrong with this scenario is that the United Farm Workers Union needs to take responsibility for its workers, rather than suing California to do so. </p>
<p>The union collects union dues and is supposed to represent the best interests of its members. The union under its own set of responsibilities should know if unsafe conditions exist for its members and then report those conditions to the appropriate agency such as Cal-OSHA. This would make it easier for Cal-OSHA to best appropriate the resources it has. Everyone is struggling in this economy, and expecting Cal-OSHA to hire more staff is not feasible right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Maclaren</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lawsuit-filed-to-force-state-to-enact-and-enforce-new-heat-stress-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Maclaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3432#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>Somewhere, one would have to codify the &#039;enough&#039; [water, shade, rest] but I vote for the General Duty Clause. We have workers who routinely work in &gt;100 deg F conditions - welding, heavy steel fabrication, tall tower erection. We are very cognizant of the ambient conditions and assure that all three items, above, are provided. Sometimes that&#039;s difficult in the Middle East at our clients&#039; facilities, but not too difficult here in Texas (where we are in the 45th straight day of &gt;100 deg F weather).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere, one would have to codify the &#8216;enough&#8217; [water, shade, rest] but I vote for the General Duty Clause. We have workers who routinely work in &gt;100 deg F conditions &#8211; welding, heavy steel fabrication, tall tower erection. We are very cognizant of the ambient conditions and assure that all three items, above, are provided. Sometimes that&#8217;s difficult in the Middle East at our clients&#8217; facilities, but not too difficult here in Texas (where we are in the 45th straight day of &gt;100 deg F weather).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.041 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp03.pbp.com @ 2010-03-16 08:25:18 -->