SafetyNewsAlert.comDueling doctors: Whose opinion will court believe? » Safety News Alert

Dueling doctors: Whose opinion will court believe?

July 9, 2012 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: In this week's e-newsletter, Injuries, Latest News & Views, new court decision, Workers' comp


An employee’s doctor says she suffered a workplace injury. The insurance company’s doctor says she didn’t. Who will the court believe, and will the employee get workers’ comp? There’s a lesson in this one for all employers.

Megan Peterson worked as a certified nursing assistant for The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society’s nursing home.

One night, she bent down to help a resident with a wheelchair foot pedal, stood up and felt a sharp pain in her lower back. Peterson told her supervisor she had back pain and asked for medication. She took Tylenol and completed her shift.

The next day, Peterson couldn’t move from the waist down due to pain. An ambulance took her to a hospital ER. A CAT scan revealed a disc protrusion. She was released but told to get bed rest.

Peterson went to a board certified orthopedic surgeon for treatment. Her doctor said she suffered a workplace injury to her back. Because of restrictions he put on her work, Peterson was fired from Good Samaritan, and then she sought workers’ comp benefits.

Good Samaritan’s workers’ comp insurance company retained another doctor who reviewed Peterson’s medical records. That doctor said Peterson’s back injury was caused by a preexisting condition, not from a work injury.

The state Department of Labor adopted the insurance company doctor’s opinion and denied Peterson benefits. An appeals court upheld that opinion. Peterson appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court.

The state’s highest court reversed the opinion. The judges noted Peterson’s doctor was the only one to actually see her. The insurance company’s doctor only reviewed her medical records — he never saw her. The court also said her doctor’s credentials were superior to those of the insurance company’s physician.

“The opinion of an examining physician should be given substantial weight when compared to the opinion of a doctor who only conducts a review of medical records,” the court wrote.

There’s the lesson: If your workers’ comp insurance carrier wants to deny a claim, it better make sure its doctor actually examines the employee to make it more likely the denial will stand up to a challenge.

(Peterson v. Good Samaritan, Supreme Court of SD, No. 26214-rev, 6/27/12)

Share

The Safety Insights You Need
Get the latest safety news, trends, and insights - delivered weekly.


Join over 334,000 safety pros:

Privacy policy

Tags: , , ,


  • Mike R

    I have long believed that if a person is injured as a result of their employment, they should be covered under workers compensation. If an employee is injured while not working, then they should not be entitled to workers compensation. If an employee has a pre-existing condition that a work activity triggers, then they there should be a way to proportion the award based on the work activity and the pre-existing condition.

    For those who believe that worker’s compensation should pay for all employee health problems, then the system needs to be changed and everyone should have to pay for that insurance, not the employer. I have worked for a small nonprofit and have seen a handful of claims that were similar to this that were allowed. The injured worker leaves a huge cost on the books that results in a huge increase in Workers Compensation premiums on the employer. If the employer can continue to operate, it is remaining employees who suffer to make up the difference with no raises, decreases in benefits, trimming down on training and new equipment, etc. And these conditions will last for years after the injured worker has left.

  • Sally

    My now deceased husband spent days hefting an old upright piano around in an attempt to exacerbate the results of a motorcycle injury, and combined with a pre-existing condition he made an attempt to defraud his insurance company. Fortunately, he lost, but I know this type of deception happens. It’s a shame that deserving people must endure the scrutiny by workers’ comp panels and insurance companies as a result of greed.

  • http://facebook.com/limemedic Mike

    Its so disapointing and satisfing to see stories like this, Companies are always tring to get out of paying benifits I understand there are cases where the employees are just trying to scam their employers but if you are going to deny benifits at least have some proof send them to a doctor have an actual exam and get it right…dont just send a letter in the mail stating “Were denying you our doctor thinks your lying……blah blah”

    Thumbs up!


advertisement



advertisement

Recent Popular Articles