<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>SafetyNewsAlert.com &#187; whistleblower</title> <atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/category/whistleblower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com</link> <description>Occupational safety and health news for workplace safety professionals.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>State issues fines for violating swine flu standards</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/state-issues-fines-for-violating-swine-flu-standards/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/state-issues-fines-for-violating-swine-flu-standards/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Respiratory safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DOSH]]></category> <category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category> <category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category> <category><![CDATA[respirators]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=5918</guid> <description><![CDATA[At least one state made good on threats to fine healthcare facilities if they didn&#8217;t protect their employees by following H1N1 flu standards.
Washington&#8217;s Division of Occupational safety and Health (DOSH) fined Sacred Heart Medical Center in Spokane $8,000 for failing to follow state and national H1N1 flu safety standards.
The Washington State Nurses Association filed [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least one state made good on threats to fine healthcare facilities if they didn&#8217;t protect their employees by following H1N1 flu standards. <span
id="more-5918"></span></p><p>Washington&#8217;s Division of Occupational safety and Health (DOSH) fined Sacred Heart Medical Center in Spokane $8,000 for failing to follow state and national H1N1 flu safety standards.</p><p>The Washington State <a
title="Press release" href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sacred-heart-medical-center-cited-for-violation-of-safety-standards-in-h1n1-prevention-84740292.html" target="_blank">Nurses Association filed a complaint</a> against Sacred Heart. Nurses at the hospital were reporting difficulty in accessing properly fit-tested N-95 masks when treating patients with H1N1 flu.</p><p>Specific violations include:</p><ul><li>inadequate written respiratory protection program</li><li>not all employees who wear N-95 respirators were fit tested or trained on an annual basis, and</li><li>no provisions were made for men with facial hair, which can interfere with the seal of N-95 respirators.</li></ul> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5918&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/state-issues-fines-for-violating-swine-flu-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Top 10 OSHA fines of 2009</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Falls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fatality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Safety training]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Top-10 list]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[construction safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cost of safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[criminal charges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fire/explosion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[inspections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA fines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[prison time]]></category> <category><![CDATA[top 10]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=5863</guid> <description><![CDATA[
In the first year of the Obama administration, OSHA was busy handing out fines the likes of which hadn&#8217;t been seen for eight years. Here&#8217;s our rundown of 10 significant fines from the last 12 months, and what they mean for businesses:OSHA issues largest fine ever: $87.4 million to BP. This fine demonstrates OSHA&#8217;s [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5342" title="topten" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/topten.jpg" alt="topten" width="347" height="346" /></p><p>In the first year of the Obama administration, OSHA was busy handing out fines the likes of which hadn&#8217;t been seen for eight years. Here&#8217;s our rundown of 10 significant fines from the last 12 months, and what they mean for businesses: <span
id="more-5863"></span></p><ol><li><strong>OSHA issues largest fine ever: $87.4 million to BP. </strong>This fine demonstrates OSHA&#8217;s intent to check up on companies once they&#8217;ve made serious safety mistakes. The agency evaluated BP&#8217;s progress after the 2005 fire and explosion that killed 15 people and injured 170 more at its Texas City, TX refinery. OSHA issued 270 &#8220;notifications of failure to abate&#8221; and identified 439 new willful violations at the plant.</li><li><strong>Two executives face prison time and huge fines in deaths of five workers. </strong>Phillipe Goutagny and James Thompson, executives with RPI Coating, each face 2.5 years in prison and a fine up to $1.25 million if convicted. On Oct. 2, 2007, vapor from a solvent ignited inside a tunnel at a hydroelectric plant in Colorado. Workers survived the blast but were overcome by smoke and fumes and died of asphyxiation. OSHA says it will work more closely with the Justice Department in cases like these to bring criminal charges against executives with penalties that include prison time.</li><li><strong>OSHA wastes no time in using new per-employee citations, issues $1.2 million fine. </strong>G.S. Robbins &amp; Co. of St. Louis, MO, was hit with 21 egregious willful citations for hazardous chemical handling. Each citation was on a per-instance basis. Even during this period of difficult economic recovery, OSHA won&#8217;t hesitate to use per-instance, per-employee fines to hike total fine amounts. This wasn&#8217;t the only instance in which OSHA used per-instance citations in 2009 (see item #7 below).</li><li><strong>Company hit with $1.14 million fine following employee complaint. </strong>Are the big fines relegated only to incidents involving deaths or multiple serious injuries? Hardly. OSHA began a December 2008 inspection at Milk Specialties in Whitehall, WI, in response to an employee complaint. Willful citations were issued for the employer&#8217;s failure to comply with OSHA&#8217;s confined space and lockout/tagout regulations. OSHA is taking employee complaints seriously.</li><li><strong>After two similar incidents, owner and manager go to jail. </strong>ANC Roofing of Santa Rosa, CA, owner Kenneth Alton pleaded no contest to failing to protect employees from a hazard. He was sentenced to nine months in jail and a $248,000 fine. Supervisor Robert McAfee pleaded no contest to one misdemeanor violation and was sentenced to 30 days in jail. On May 11, 2006, an ANC employee backed into an unguarded skylight and fell 21 feet to his death. Four months later, another ANC employee suffered major head trauma when he fell 19 feet from an unprotected skylight.</li><li><strong>OSHA fines Wal-Mart $7,000 for worker trampling incident. </strong>A Wal-Mart worker was trampled to death by a crowd of 2,000 shoppers on the day after Thanksgiving in 2008. OSHA said Wal-Mart should have recognized that its employees were exposed to being crushed by the crowd based on previous experience. Wal-Mart fought the fine. OSHA used the General Duty Clause to issue the fine and has said it will use the GDC in similar situations where safety was compromised but a specific regulation wasn&#8217;t violated.</li><li><strong>Company faces $1.09 million OSHA fine for 202 willful violations. </strong>OSHA didn&#8217;t really need anyone&#8217;s permission to start issuing per-instance fines (see item #3 above), but it got the go-ahead in the form of a decision from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC). The appeals panel ruled OSHA properly cited Smalis Painting Co. on a per-employee basis for violations of the lead-in-construction regulations, in connection with a project near Pittsburgh, PA. OSHA monitored six Smalis employees for lead exposure. Based on that data, OSHA issued violations for all employees who would have been exposed to the same hazards.</li><li><strong>OSHA is getting companies to agree to implement safety and health improvements above what&#8217;s required by regulations. </strong>A-1 Excavating of Bloomer, WI, agreed to make numerous changes in its work processes in exchange for lowering fines from almost $900,000 to $470,000. A-1 has to hire a full-time safety director, develop and implement site-specific safety and health plans for all major projects, identify all job sites to OSHA before work begins for the next three years, reduce the salary of job superintendents and project managers who fail to comply with OSHA requirements, and retain a third-party safety consultant.</li><li><strong>Cintas agrees to pay $3 million in fines and to comply with other conditions. </strong>In some cases, it hasn&#8217;t been an either-or situation between fines and strict safety improvements. After a worker was killed when he fell onto an unguarded conveyor and was dragged into a 300-degree industrial dryer, Cintas agreed to the huge fine <span
style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> to retain a team of independent experts to develop permanent fixes and review interim controls. Cintas also agreed to hire additional safety staff, conduct more frequent internal safety inspections, and establish new systems to examine employee complaints.</li><li><strong>A construction company agrees to pay $750,000 in fines and cut the pay of unsafe supervisors. </strong>Broadway Concrete of New York, NY, agreed to reduce the salaries of senior job superintendents who failed to comply with job safety practices. Broadway also agreed to hire a full-time corporate safety director, develop a new corporate safety plan, and provide OSHA with information on major projects and access to all job sites for the next four years.</li></ol><p>What do you think of OSHA&#8217;s recent enforcement tactics? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5863&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-osha-fines-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>24</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New campaign launched for harsher OSHA fines</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-web-site-says-employer-negligence-causes-16-worker-deaths-per-day/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-web-site-says-employer-negligence-causes-16-worker-deaths-per-day/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Fatality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What do you think?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[criminal charges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[16 deaths per day]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Protecting America's Workers Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[worker deaths]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=4754</guid> <description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Sixteen workers are killed a day in the United States because of reckless negligence on the part of their employers,&#8221; according to a new Web site.
The statement on the home page of 16deathsperday.com goes on to say, &#8220;Under existing laws, these employers get a slap on the wrist, or walk away scot-free. Meanwhile, workers [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
class="alignnone size-full wp-image-41" title="osha-logo" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/osha-logo.jpg" alt="osha-logo" width="360" height="179" /></p><p>&#8220;Sixteen workers are killed a day in the United States because of reckless negligence on the part of their employers,&#8221; according to a new Web site. <span
id="more-4754"></span></p><p>The statement on the home page of <a
title="16 deaths per day home page" href="http://16deathsperday.com/" target="_blank">16deathsperday.com</a> goes on to say, &#8220;Under existing laws, these employers get a slap on the wrist, or walk away scot-free. Meanwhile, workers who blow the whistle face threats and retaliation at the workplace.&#8221;</p><p>A five-minute video profiles two workplace fatalities where companies paid relatively small fines and didn&#8217;t face criminal prosecution.</p><p>The group&#8217;s message: Companies would rather pay low OSHA fines rather than spend more money on worker safety.</p><p>To change that, the Web site endorses passage of the <a
title="Text of Protecting America's Workers Act" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2067/text" target="_blank">Protecting America&#8217;s Workers Act</a>. That bill would:</p><ul><li>allow OSHA to pursue criminal charges against a company for an employee&#8217;s death, including fines and up to 10 years in prison for owners and managers. Criminal penalties for serious bodily injury to an employee could include up to five years in prison.</li><li>increase the civil penalty for an employee death from $50,000 to $250,000, with a minimum $25,000 fine for companies with 25 or fewer employees</li><li>raise the maximum fines for willful and repeat citations to $120,000, and</li><li>increase OSHA fines every four years for inflation.</li></ul><p>What do you think of 16deathsperday.com&#8217;s message? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=4754&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-web-site-says-employer-negligence-causes-16-worker-deaths-per-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>61</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Worker fired after expressing safety concerns; OSHA files lawsuit</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-fired-after-expressing-safety-concerns-osha-files-lawsuit/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-fired-after-expressing-safety-concerns-osha-files-lawsuit/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fire/explosion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bering Sea Eccotech]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Camp Pendleton Marine base]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3995</guid> <description><![CDATA[An employee of a government contractor was laid off shortly after expressing safety concerns to upper management at his company. Now OSHA is getting involved.
OSHA has filed a whistleblower lawsuit on behalf of an employee of Bering Sea Eccotech, based in Anchorage, Alaska.
The worker complained about safety violations after observing two dangerous explosions. The [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An employee of a government contractor was laid off shortly after expressing safety concerns to upper management at his company. Now OSHA is getting involved. <span
id="more-3995"></span></p><p>OSHA has filed a <a
title="OSHA files whistleblower suit" href="http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=16368" target="_blank">whistleblower lawsuit</a> on behalf of an employee of Bering Sea Eccotech, based in Anchorage, Alaska.</p><p>The worker complained about safety violations after observing two dangerous explosions. The company barred the employee from being rehired.</p><p>An OSHA investigation revealed that the former employee&#8217;s complaint had merit. The company still refused to rehire the employee or pay back wages.</p><p>The lawsuit seeks to reinstate the employee, secure compensatory damages and lost wages, and require the company to post a notice for 60 days that explains employee rights under the whistleblower section of the OSH Act.</p><p>Bering Sea Eccotech specializes in unexploded ordnance clean-up, range management and remediation services.</p><p>The company is responsible for cleaning up unexploded ordnance at the Camp Pendleton Marine base in San Diego.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3995&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-fired-after-expressing-safety-concerns-osha-files-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Safety complaint leads to seven-figure fine</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/complaint-leads-to-seven-figure-osha-fine/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/complaint-leads-to-seven-figure-osha-fine/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[confined spaces]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cost of safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[employee safety complaints]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Milk Specialties Co.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[seven-figure OSHA fine]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=2797</guid> <description><![CDATA[OSHA takes employee safety complaints seriously, especially when a company has a record of previous infractions.
Milk Specialties Co. of Whitehall, WI, faces $1.14 million in OSHA fines in connection with a Dec. 2008 inspection. Inspectors visited the facility in response to a complaint alleging a variety of hazards at Milk Specialties&#8217; whey processing plant.
OSHA [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSHA takes employee safety complaints seriously, especially when a company has a record of previous infractions. <span
id="more-2797"></span></p><p>Milk Specialties Co. of Whitehall, WI, faces $1.14 million in OSHA fines in connection with a Dec. 2008 inspection. Inspectors visited the facility in response to a complaint alleging a variety of hazards at Milk Specialties&#8217; whey processing plant.</p><p>OSHA issued 17 willful violations, totaling $1.07 million, for confined space and control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) requirements.</p><p>The citations say untrained employees entered confined spaces and performed maintenance and cleaning on powered equipment without protection from various hazards.</p><p>The company also faces 4 repeat and 17 serious citations that account for the balance of the total fine. Among the other citations:</p><ul><li>combustible dust hazards</li><li>lack of exit route lighting and signage</li><li>uninspected fire extinguishers, and</li><li>deficiencies in guarding floor and wall openings.</li></ul><p>Milk Specialties has been inspected by OSHA 15 times since 1974, including 4 inspections in Wisconsin between 2006 and 2008.</p><p>The company has 15 days to accept or appeal the citations.</p><p>You can read more about OSHA&#8217;s citation <a
title="OSHA citation" href="http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&amp;p_id=18128" target="_blank">here.</a></p><p>OSHA wielded its more expensive willful, repeat and serious citations against this company that has a history of safety violations.</p><p>But, is a million-dollar citation enough, or should OSHA take further steps against the company such as closing this particular facility until safety improvements are made?</p><p>Let us know what you think in the Comments Box below.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2797&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/complaint-leads-to-seven-figure-osha-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New administrator says &#8216;OSHA is back&#8217;</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-administrator-says-osha-is-back/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-administrator-says-osha-is-back/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:00:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New rules and regulations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jordan Barab]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA enforcement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA inspectors]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=2529</guid> <description><![CDATA[Some tough talk about enforcement from OSHA&#8217;s interim administrator, Jordan Barab.
No one should really be surprised that OSHA under the Obama administration is stepping up enforcement.
But for anyone who had any doubts, Barab is making it pretty plain.
In a recent speech to the Maritime Advisory Committee, Barab noted the funding increase OSHA has already [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some tough talk about enforcement from OSHA&#8217;s interim administrator, Jordan Barab. <span
id="more-2529"></span></p><p>No one should really be surprised that OSHA under the Obama administration is stepping up enforcement.</p><p>But for anyone who had any doubts, Barab is making it pretty plain.</p><p>In a recent speech to the Maritime Advisory Committee, Barab noted the funding increase OSHA has already received to boost enforcement.</p><p>He capped off the budgetary summary by saying, &#8220;I want to be absolutely clear: OSHA is back in the business of standards and enforcement.&#8221;</p><p>Barab also noted that the funding increases aren&#8217;t over. The fiscal year 2010 budget proposes another $50 million increase for the agency.</p><p>OSHA plans to use part of that increase to hire 200 more employees: 130 more inspectors, 25 more investigators assigned specifically to whistleblower cases and 20 more staff who will help develop safety and health standards.</p><p>A transcript of Barab&#8217;s speech is <a
href="http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=SPEECHES&amp;p_id=2070">here</a>.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2529&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-administrator-says-osha-is-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>House Democrats reintroduce bill to strengthen OSHA</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/house-democrats-reintroduce-bill-to-strengthen-osha/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/house-democrats-reintroduce-bill-to-strengthen-osha/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:00:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Who Got Fined and Why?]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[H.R. 2067]]></category> <category><![CDATA[increase OSHA fines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Protecting America's Workers Act]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=2120</guid> <description><![CDATA[Backed by more solid majorities in the House and Senate, Democrats have reintroduced the Protecting America&#8217;s Workers Act which aims to expand OSHA&#8217;s reach and increase the penalties it can issue for safety and health violations.
The bill (H.R. 2067) would expand OSHA&#8217;s jurisdiction to public employees, including federal, state and local government workers.
Whistleblowers would [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backed by more solid majorities in the House and Senate, Democrats have reintroduced the Protecting America&#8217;s Workers Act which aims to expand OSHA&#8217;s reach and increase the penalties it can issue for safety and health violations. <span
id="more-2120"></span></p><p>The bill (<a
href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c111:./temp/~c1118IBMHU">H.R. 2067</a>) would expand OSHA&#8217;s jurisdiction to public employees, including federal, state and local government workers.</p><p>Whistleblowers would also get more protection.</p><p>But some of the biggest changes would be made to penalties OSHA could issue:</p><ul><li>Fines for willful and repeat citations would increase, with the minimum changing from $5,000 to $8,000 and the maximum from $70,000 to $120,000.</li><li>The maximum fine for serious, failure-to-abate and other-than-serious citations would increase from $7,000 to $12,000.</li><li>The maximum for violations of posting requirements would also increase from $7,000 to $12,000.</li><li>If a violation causes the death of an employee, civil penalty amounts can range from $50,000 to $250,000, with $25,000 as the minimum for smaller companies with 25 or fewer employees.</li><li>OSHA could also pursue criminal charges against a company for an employee&#8217;s death, including fines and up to ten years in prison for owners and managers. Criminal penalties for serious bodily injury to an employee could include up to five years in prison.</li></ul><p>The bill would also increase OSHA fines every four years for inflation.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2120&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/house-democrats-reintroduce-bill-to-strengthen-osha/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>2 OSHA whistleblower orders in 3 days, 1 of them huge</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/2-osha-whistleblower-orders-in-3-days-1-of-them-huge/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/2-osha-whistleblower-orders-in-3-days-1-of-them-huge/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transportation safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[employees raise safety concerns]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Southern Air]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UPS]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=1925</guid> <description><![CDATA[OSHA seems to be sending a message to employers via two recent whistleblower orders: When employees raise safety concerns, listen.
In the first case, OSHA has ordered Southern Air, Inc., of Norwalk, CT, to pay nine former employees more than $7.9 million in wages, damages and legal fees. The air cargo carrier must also withdraw [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSHA seems to be sending a message to employers via two recent whistleblower orders: When employees raise safety concerns, listen. <span
id="more-1925"></span></p><p>In the first case, OSHA has ordered Southern Air, Inc., of Norwalk, CT, to pay nine former employees more than $7.9 million in wages, damages and legal fees. The air cargo carrier must also withdraw a lawsuit against the former workers.</p><p>After some of the workers raised safety concerns about the company, Southern Air filed a defamation lawsuit against them.</p><p>An OSHA investigation found the company&#8217;s lawsuit was filed in retaliation against the workers.</p><p>Southern must pay the employees $6.0 million in lost future earnings, $1.8 million in compensatory damages and $129,000 in legal fees.</p><p>In the second case, announced just three days later, OSHA ordered United Parcel Service (UPS) to immediately rehire, pay back wages, benefits, compensatory damages and $50,000 in punitive damages to a former San Francisco-area driver.</p><p>OSHA says the driver was wrongfully terminated after he refused to drive after raising safety concerns because of bad weather and visibility issues.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1925&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/2-osha-whistleblower-orders-in-3-days-1-of-them-huge/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Judge orders company to pay in whistleblower case</title><link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/judge-orders-company-to-pay-in-whistleblower-case/</link> <comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/judge-orders-company-to-pay-in-whistleblower-case/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:00:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category> <category><![CDATA[back wages]]></category> <category><![CDATA[filing a complaint with OSHA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=1277</guid> <description><![CDATA[A federal judge has ordered a commercial laundry to pay up in a case involving an employee who claims to have been fired for filing a complaint with OSHA about unsafe conditions.
Party Rental Enterprises, Inc., dba Able Linen Service, must pay the former employee $20,000 in back wages plus $17,000 in punitive damages, and [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has ordered a commercial laundry to pay up in a case involving an employee who claims to have been fired for filing a complaint with OSHA about unsafe conditions. <span
id="more-1277"></span></p><p>Party Rental Enterprises, Inc., dba Able Linen Service, must pay the former employee $20,000 in back wages plus $17,000 in punitive damages, and delete any references to suspension and discharge from the employee&#8217;s personnel file.</p><p>The company will also have to post the OSHA whistleblower poster at its locations in Auburn, Cicero and Liverpool, NY. Employees at the three locations must receive the OSHA whistleblower fact sheet, too.</p><p>The employee&#8217;s complaint dates back to 2005. OSHA ordered the employee&#8217;s reinstatement and payment of accrued wages and benefits.</p><p>However, the company didn&#8217;t respond to the investigation, the order, subpoenas, summonses and other legal action until the Department of Labor secured a default judgment from the court.</p><p>The Occupational Safety and Health Act protects employees&#8217; rights to file a complaint with OSHA or to bring safety and health issues to the attention of their employers without fear of termination or other reprisal.</p> <img
src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1277&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/judge-orders-company-to-pay-in-whistleblower-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/16 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp05.pbp.com @ 2010-03-12 07:41:30 -->