<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SafetyNewsAlert.com &#187; Lighter Side of Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/category/lighter-side-of-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com</link>
	<description>Occupational safety and health news for workplace safety professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t take away my beer</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/dont-take-away-my-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/dont-take-away-my-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alcohol/drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlsberg brewery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=6500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine this: A company just recently ended a policy from 1847 that allowed its workers to drink as much beer on the job as they liked. The workers are upset, and they went on strike. 
We&#8217;re not making this up.
The Carlsberg brewery in Copenhagen, Denmark, just changed its policy on beer in the workplace.
It used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine this: A company just recently ended a policy from 1847 that allowed its workers to drink as much beer on the job as they liked. The workers are upset, and they went on strike. <span id="more-6500"></span></p>
<p>We&#8217;re not making this up.</p>
<p>The Carlsberg brewery in Copenhagen, Denmark, just <a title="www.cnn.com" href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/04/09/denmark.carlsberg.strike/index.html?section=cnn_latest" target="_blank">changed its policy</a> on beer in the workplace.</p>
<p>It used to allow workers to take as many beers as they wanted from coolers around the production and warehouse areas. The only restriction: You can&#8217;t be drunk at work. It was up to the workers to be responsible. So, you see, they were thinking about safety.</p>
<p>Now, the workers can only drink beer during their half-hour lunch breaks in the company canteen.</p>
<p>So scores of workers went on strike.</p>
<p>Their union says it doesn&#8217;t mind the new policy, which other companies are adopting throughout Denmark. What bothers the union and workers is that they weren&#8217;t consulted on the policy.</p>
<p>Carlsberg&#8217;s truck drivers joined the production and warehouse workers in the strike, even though they&#8217;re covered by different beer rules. The truck drivers can bring three beers from the canteen because they don&#8217;t often have time to have their lunch there.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6500&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/dont-take-away-my-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worker habits that annoy safety pros the most</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-habits-that-annoy-safety-pros-the-most/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-habits-that-annoy-safety-pros-the-most/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Would You Do?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's Working in Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' attitudes about safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying worker habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no time for safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we always did it that way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=6447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Recently, we wrote about a survey that put &#8220;safety&#8221; as the No. 6 most annoying thing in the workplace. So, we asked you what is most annoying about workers when it comes to safety. Here are your answers: 
One of the most common complaints was workers who say things like, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been doing that this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6489" title="SafetyAnnoyed" src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/SafetyAnnoyed.jpg" alt="SafetyAnnoyed" width="360" height="360" /></p>
<p>Recently, we wrote about a <a title="Top 10 office annoyances, safety on list" href="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/top-10-office-annoyances-safety-makes-the-list/#more-6316" target="_blank">survey</a> that put &#8220;safety&#8221; as the No. 6 most annoying thing in the workplace. So, we asked you what is most annoying about workers when it comes to safety. Here are your answers: <span id="more-6447"></span></p>
<p>One of the most common complaints was workers who say things like, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been doing that this way for 20 years and have never gotten hurt.&#8221; A slight variation on the theme: &#8220;I have 20 years experience. Don&#8217;t tell me how to do my job.&#8221;</p>
<p>When it comes to one specific worker action that is annoying, &#8220;wearing safety glasses/goggles on top of their heads&#8221; was mentioned the most.</p>
<p>Some other annoying worker practices when it comes to safety:</p>
<ul>
<li>Supervisors who walk right by obvious safety violations.</li>
<li>&#8220;Safety is the safety manager&#8217;s job, not mine.&#8221;</li>
<li>Employees who say they don&#8217;t have time for safety.</li>
<li>Safety costs too much.</li>
<li>Managers who require workers to attend safety meetings and then don&#8217;t show up themselves.</li>
<li>Workers who prefer not to know about safety rules and then say they were out of the loop.</li>
<li>Not reporting injuries. &#8220;It happened a month ago, but I thought it would quit hurting, so I didn&#8217;t tell anyone.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I&#8217;m the engineer. I get the thing to run. You&#8217;re the safety person. You figure out how to do it safely.&#8221;</li>
<li>Upper management that won&#8217;t get serious about safety.</li>
<li>&#8220;Where does it say that I have to _____?&#8221;</li>
<li>Blocking exits, aisles, fire extinguishers, eyewash stations, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>After reading all of those (and probably recognizing many, if not all of them), are you really annoyed?</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t want you to spend the rest of the day that way. So, we&#8217;ll note that a number of you seemed to have a good sense of humor while writing about these annoyances. And while safety is, of course, very serious business, it can help you get through the day to have a sense of humor about it.</p>
<p>Here are some worker annoyances from safety pros that show that they&#8217;re not about to let the few employees who ignore safety get them down:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;We are safety-ed to death.&#8221; (The workers who said that obvious didn&#8217;t think about their statement.)</li>
<li>&#8220;Safety, safety, safety. All we ever talk about is safety, and we don&#8217;t even have any accidents around here.&#8221; (Well, must be working, right? )</li>
<li>&#8220;We never had all this safety s*** before,&#8221; from the guy missing part of his thumb because it was ripped off in a drill press.</li>
<li>Right out of the childhood playbook: &#8220;They&#8217;re not doing it, so why should I?&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;That wouldn&#8217;t be in the aisle for someone to trip over if we didn&#8217;t have to participate in this Safety Tour during our clean-up time.&#8221;</li>
<li>When people open a meeting by saying, &#8220;Let&#8217;s get this party started.&#8221; If it were a party, there&#8217;d be more beer and hot people in the room.</li>
</ul>
<p>And some of you really liked one comment and requested a copy of the so-called &#8220;Dumb-ass Certificate&#8221;:</p>
<p>Deviation Under Modified Basis—Agreement Support Sheet (DUMB-ASS Certificate)</p>
<p>I understand that there are identified rules and procedures in place but I cannot accomplish the task on the basis of those rules. I am applying for this Dumb-Ass certificate so I can get an exemption to perform (name task) without following the following safety procedures.</p>
<p>The reason that I want the Dumb-Ass exemption is (check all that apply)&#8230;</p>
<p>You get the picture.</p>
<p>When it comes right down to it, a one-word comment we received sums it all up. The most annoying worker habit when it comes to safety: Excuses.</p>
<p>How do you counter workers&#8217; excuses? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6447&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/worker-habits-that-annoy-safety-pros-the-most/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New twist on injury lawyer ads: This one&#8217;s funny, on purpose</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-twist-on-injury-lawyer-ads-this-ones-funny-on-purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-twist-on-injury-lawyer-ads-this-ones-funny-on-purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injured employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury lawyer ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trolman Glaser Lichtman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=5561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of the problem with having injured employees miss days at work is that they&#8217;ll see all those personal injury lawyer ads while they&#8217;re watching daytime TV and then decide to sue. 
And that&#8217;s despite how awful some of the ads are.
Well, one New York law firm is winking at its audience, saying, &#8220;We know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem with having injured employees miss days at work is that they&#8217;ll see all those personal injury lawyer ads while they&#8217;re watching daytime TV and then decide to sue. <span id="more-5561"></span></p>
<p>And that&#8217;s despite how awful some of the ads are.</p>
<p>Well, one New York law firm is winking at its audience, saying, &#8220;We know those other ads are really bad.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="tgllaw.com" href="http://tgllaw.com/" target="_blank">Trolman, Glaser &amp; Lichtman</a> has <a title="You Tube" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Eck-dlk0n4" target="_blank">a new TV ad</a> that pokes fun at other injury lawyer ads.</p>
<p>A woman says she&#8217;s in excruciating pain. Every time she moves, it feels like a machete chopping down on her.</p>
<p>The punch line: &#8220;It was the worst paper cut I ever had. They made that paper way too sharp. Someone has to pay.&#8221; She holds up her finger with a small bandage on it.</p>
<p>Then, the tagline, via a voiceover: &#8220;If you&#8217;ve been injured, call us, but keep in mind: You really need to be injured.&#8221;</p>
<p>Law firm partner Jeffrey Lichtman tells <a title="NY Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/business/media/20adco.html" target="_blank"><em>The New York Times</em></a>, &#8220;It&#8217;s saying to the public that we understand that we&#8217;re a litigious society, No. 1 and, No. 2, we understand that litigiousness is food for a joke. But we also recognize there&#8217;s an importance to having access to the court system if there has been an injustice.&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5561&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/new-twist-on-injury-lawyer-ads-this-ones-funny-on-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you bare all for the sake of safety?</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/would-you-bare-all-for-the-sake-of-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/would-you-bare-all-for-the-sake-of-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=3001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think you&#8217;ve tried everything to get and keep employees&#8217; attention during regular safety meetings? You probably haven&#8217;t tried this. 
Air New Zealand is using a new tactic to make sure passengers keep their eyes on video screens for its in-flight safety instructions.
The carrier&#8217;s safety video for domestic service on its Boeing 737 planes show pilot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think you&#8217;ve tried everything to get and keep employees&#8217; attention during regular safety meetings? You probably haven&#8217;t tried this. <span id="more-3001"></span></p>
<p>Air New Zealand is using a new tactic to make sure passengers keep their eyes on video screens for its in-flight safety instructions.</p>
<p>The carrier&#8217;s safety video for domestic service on its Boeing 737 planes show pilot and cabin crew dressed only in body paint.</p>
<p>To make sure the video wouldn&#8217;t get a X rating, the camera angles are carefully chosen and the crew holds up strategically-placed items such as life vests.</p>
<p>You can view the safety video online <a title="Air New Zealand" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/youtube.htm?v=7-Mq9HAE62Y" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3001&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/would-you-bare-all-for-the-sake-of-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell co-workers &#8212; anonymously &#8212; to take their coughing and sneezing home</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tell-co-workers-anonymously-to-take-their-coughing-and-sneezing-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tell-co-workers-anonymously-to-take-their-coughing-and-sneezing-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Illnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worker health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stay home when you're sick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent swine flu scare, we&#8217;ve heard the plea once again for ill employees to stay home instead of spreading sickness at work. Now you can send the message anonymously, &#8220;Stay home when you&#8217;re sick,&#8221; specifically to those who ignore that advice. 
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a series of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent swine flu scare, we&#8217;ve heard the plea once again for ill employees to stay home instead of spreading sickness at work. Now you can send the message anonymously, &#8220;Stay home when you&#8217;re sick,&#8221; specifically to those who ignore that advice. <span id="more-2340"></span></p>
<p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a series of e-cards that address health issues such as blood pressure, diabetes and pregnancy.</p>
<p>But some of the cards could really come in handy when any sort of illness &#8212; swine flu, a stomach virus or even the common cold &#8212; appears in your workplace.</p>
<p>One card shows a picture of a woman with her hand to her forehead. It says, &#8220;Stay home!&#8221; The message inside when you click on the card: &#8220;Stay home if you have symptoms, like fever, cough, runny or stuffy nose, sore throat, body aches, headache, chills, and fatigue.&#8221; There&#8217;s also a link for recipients to click and get more information about the flu.</p>
<p>Know of co-workers who don&#8217;t wash their hands after using the restroom? Send them the &#8220;Wash &#8216;em&#8221; e-card. It recommends recipients wash their hands with warm soapy water or use alcohol-based hand cleaners.</p>
<p>The CDC&#8217;s e-cards are online <a href="http://www2a.cdc.gov/ecards/index.asp">here</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2340&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/tell-co-workers-anonymously-to-take-their-coughing-and-sneezing-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can OSHA regulate professional sports?</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/can-osha-regulate-professional-sports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/can-osha-regulate-professional-sports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shattered bats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of &#8220;Play ball!&#8221; will it be &#8220;Play ball &#8212; but safely&#8221;? 
It&#8217;s not likely, according to a Standard Interpretation Letter (SIL) released recently by OSHA.
A concerned baseball fan, Robert Van Laanen, wrote a letter to OSHA regarding the dangers of new wooden bats shattering.
The fan was concerned that increasing numbers of shattered bats might pose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of &#8220;Play ball!&#8221; will it be &#8220;Play ball &#8212; but safely&#8221;? <span id="more-708"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not likely, according to a Standard Interpretation Letter (SIL) released recently by OSHA.</p>
<p>A concerned baseball fan, Robert Van Laanen, wrote a letter to OSHA regarding the dangers of new wooden bats shattering.</p>
<p>The fan was concerned that increasing numbers of shattered bats might pose more hazards to players and spectators.</p>
<p>Van Laanen wanted to know if OSHA could press professional baseball to change back to sturdier wooden or metal bats.</p>
<p>The answer: Probably not.</p>
<p>In a response signed by the Director of Enforcement Programs, Richard Fairfax, OSHA said the answer depends on whether pro athletes meet the definition of &#8220;employee&#8221; under the Occupational Safety and Health Act or whether they&#8217;re independent contractors.</p>
<p>OSHA rules might apply only if they&#8217;re employees.</p>
<p>Fairfax&#8217;s letter goes on to note that the employee or contractor determination would need to be made on a case-by-case basis.</p>
<p>And even if they were considered employees, OSHA doesn&#8217;t have any specific, applicable standards that address protection for pro athletes.</p>
<p>What does this all boil down to? This statement: &#8220;In most cases, however, OSHA does not take enforcement action with regard to professional athletes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Leave it to OSHA to take a nine paragraph letter to say &#8220;No.&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=708&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/can-osha-regulate-professional-sports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lighter side of safety: Do struck-by hazards exist in space?</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-do-struck-by-hazards-exist-in-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-do-struck-by-hazards-exist-in-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[struck-by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work at heights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have employees who work at heights, you&#8217;ve probably warned them to properly secure tools so no one below suffers a &#8220;struck-by&#8221; injury. Recently, an astronaut found out dropping tools in space produces a much different result. 
The astronaut may never get her hands on those tools again.
Heidemarie Stefanshyn-Piper was working with fellow astronaut [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have employees who work at heights, you&#8217;ve probably warned them to properly secure tools so no one below suffers a &#8220;struck-by&#8221; injury. Recently, an astronaut found out dropping tools in space produces a much different result. <span id="more-461"></span></p>
<p>The astronaut may never get her hands on those tools again.</p>
<p>Heidemarie Stefanshyn-Piper was working with fellow astronaut Stephen Bowen during a spacewalk outside the International Space Station.</p>
<p>They were attempting to clean and lubricate a stuck joint on a solar panel.</p>
<p>When a grease gun inside Stefanshyn-Piper&#8217;s tool bag exploded, she accidentally let go of it.</p>
<p>The bag and its contents floated off into space.</p>
<p>Earlier, the astronauts spotted a screw floating by, but were too far away to catch it. They don&#8217;t know where it came from, and Mission Control said it didn&#8217;t pose a serious hazard. (Apparently, having a screw loose is not uncommon at NASA.)</p>
<p>And just like earthbound employees who work at heights, the two astronauts were tied off. They had 85-foot tethers to keep them connected to the space shuttle Endeavor at all times.</p>
<p>You can watch raw video of the loss of the tool bag <a href="http://www.nbc4i.com/midwest/cmh/news.apx.-content-articles-CMH-2008-11-19-0003.html" target="_blank">here</a>. You can hear Stefanshyn-Piper say, &#8220;Oh great,&#8221; when the bag floats away.</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=461&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-do-struck-by-hazards-exist-in-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lighter side of safety: Proper PPE for smashing dishes</title>
		<link>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-proper-ppe-for-smashing-dishes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-proper-ppe-for-smashing-dishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hosier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighter Side of Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Safety News Alert sends our official kudos to San Diego entrepreneur Sarah Lavely for using proper personal protective equipment (PPE) at her small business. 
Lavely runs Sarah&#8217;s Smash Shack where people can hurl dishware and knickknacks at a wall to relieve pent-up stress.
And the only possible thing this has to do with safety is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safety News Alert sends our official kudos to San Diego entrepreneur Sarah Lavely for using proper personal protective equipment (PPE) at her small business. <span id="more-156"></span></p>
<p>Lavely runs Sarah&#8217;s Smash Shack where people can hurl dishware and knickknacks at a wall to relieve pent-up stress.</p>
<p>And the only possible thing this has to do with safety is that photos accompanying a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE49876220081009?feedType=nl&amp;feedName=usoddlyenough">wire service story</a> about the successful Smash Shack show its patrons dutifully wearing safety gear: helmets with face shields, coveralls and gloves.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the end of the safety stuff in this post. For those who are just intrigued by the idea of getting out their aggression by smashing things, keep reading.</p>
<p>Lavely charges $10 and up for 15-minute intervals. Rock music blares, and a neon sign urges people to &#8220;Break More Stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;House Special&#8221; is one of the most popular choices. It mimics a rowdy Greek supper club where diners smash 15 plates for 15 minutes. Cost: $45.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not all! Patrons can write nasty epithets on the plates with thick black markers before the smashing starts.</p>
<p>Also popular: Highly breakable picture frames (3 for $10). Slip a photo of an enemy in and smash away!</p>
<p>&#8220;It was the best $50 we spent in the last two years,&#8221; said one customer.</p>
<p>Can franchises be far behind?</p>
<img src="http://www.safetynewsalert.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=156&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safetynewsalert.com/lighter-side-of-safety-proper-ppe-for-smashing-dishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-09-03 12:58:49 -->