SafetyNewsAlert.comBusiness owner faces prison, large fine for worker electrocution » Safety News Alert

Business owner faces prison, large fine for worker electrocution

July 23, 2012 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: Compliance, Electrical safety, Fatality, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, OSHA news


The electrocution death of a worker could send the owner of a painting business to prison.

The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Western District of Pennsylvania has filed one criminal charge against Thomas Caruso, 77, owner of Modern Painting & Decorating of New Kensington, PA. Caruso is charged with willful violation of safety regulations that caused the electrocution of an employee.

The charge comes with maximum penalties of six months in prison, a $250,000 fine and one year of supervised release.

On April 7, 2010, Paul Thompson, 48, came in contact with a power line while working on a roof and painting the outside of a building in New Kensington.

Thompson was using a plastic pole that had an aluminum pole on the inside with a metal roller on the end. The paint roller or pole contacted the high voltage line.

The employee was taken to a local hospital, but he couldn’t be revived.

OSHA issued a willful violation to Modern Painting for allowing employees to work near energized power circuits. The company was also hit with two serious violations for not providing adequate fall protection and not training employees in recognizing and avoiding fall hazards.

The fines totaled $57,400 which the company paid.

“The employer was aware of the existence and proximity of the overhead power lines, as well as the danger they posed to employees, yet took no action to ensure worker safety,” said Robert Szymanski, director of OSHA’s Pittsburgh, PA, office.

OSHA regulations say employers should “not permit an employee to work in close proximity to any part of an electric power circuit unless the employee is protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuit or by insulating it.”

Doesn’t happen often

Criminal prosecution for violating OSHA regulations are rare. From 2007 through 2010, the Department of Justice acted on just 49 criminal referrals from OSHA.

Do you think criminal prosecution is warranted in this case? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

 

Share

The Safety Insights You Need
Get the latest safety news, trends, and insights - delivered weekly.


Join over 334,000 safety pros:

Privacy policy

Tags: , , ,


  • Concerned

    Whether or not the employee had knowledge of the power lines, it is still the owner’s responsibility to protect and train their employees. Had the employee been trained in electrical safety the owner would have had some legal recourse. It seems there is a lot of misconception in the amount of money it takes to properly train someone and the amount it takes to pay the fines, possible lawsuits and the inability to bid future jobs because your experience modifier is too high. Training is not that expensive and a little bit of time invested in your employees makes it a win win for everyone. In this case everyone loses, that’s what makes it crazy.

  • SHERALROH

    While I feel for the worker, isn’t he a grown man? I know I would never put myself in a situation where I could be killed. When are people going to be held responsible for some of their actions? An employee can certainly open his mouth and express a concern to his employer. He knew there were wires; he knew he had a metal roller & pole….

  • guest

    This is crazy.


advertisement



advertisement

Recent Popular Articles