SafetyNewsAlert.com2 Hershey contractors fined $288K by OSHA » Safety News Alert

2 Hershey contractors fined $288K by OSHA

February 23, 2012 by Fred Hosier
Posted in: Compliance, In this week's e-newsletter, Injuries, Latest News & Views, OSHA news, Who Got Fined and Why?


Two companies involved in packaging Hershey’s chocolates face $288,000 in OSHA fines in connection with violations regarding foreign exchange students. On top of the OSHA violations, an organization representing guest workers calls the situation one that “kills decent U.S. jobs.”

OSHA has issued nine citations to Exel, Inc., for a total of $283,000, for violations at a distribution center in Palmyra, PA. Hershey hired Exel to run the center. Another company involved in running the center, SHS Group LP, was also fined $5,000.

OSHA investigated after it received a complaint filed by the National Guestworker Alliance (NGA) on behalf of foreign students performing summer jobs at the facility.

Last August, about 200 foreign exchange students walked off the job and demonstrated, complaining about working conditions.

Six of the OSHA citations against Exel were classified as willful for failing to:

  • record injuries on the OSHA 300 log for four years
  • evaluate the accuracy of the logs before certifying them for three years, and
  • develop and implement an effective hearing conservation program.

SHS received one serious citation for failing to provide training to employees on the lockout/tagout of energy sources.

The citations claim Exel intentionally failed to report 42 serious injuries to workers over four years — 43% of all such injuries during the period.

In one case, a box hit a worker in the face, causing a corneal abrasion that required treatment in an emergency room. Many other injuries were related to lifting and moving 60-pound boxes of Hershey’s chocolates along a packing line.

Exchange students said they paid as much as $3,500 to work and travel in the U.S. for several months. Some reported they were paid $8.35 an hour but monthly rent of $400 was deducted from their paychecks. The students also reported neck, back and arm injuries from lifting and carrying boxes.

The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division is investigating potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The students were hosted by a nonprofit, the Council for Educational Travel (CETUSA). The Labor Dept. is looking into whether CETUSA violated the law by taking excessive deductions from the students’ paychecks for housing and other services.

The federal government has banned CETUSA from bringing students into the U.S.

The NGA called the situation a “case study of the way a major corporation uses a subcontracting giant to kill decent U.S. jobs.”

Exel says it will contest its OSHA citations.

Share

The Safety Insights You Need
Get the latest safety news, trends, and insights - delivered weekly.


Join over 334,000 safety pros:

Privacy policy

Tags: , , ,


  • Tammie

    Mimidunn,
    Perhaps you should read the article again.
    Six of the OSHA citations against Exel were classified as willful for failing to:
    record injuries on the OSHA 300 log for four years
    evaluate the accuracy of the logs before certifying them for three years, and
    develop and implement an effective hearing conservation program.The citations claim Exel intentionally failed to report 42 serious injuries to workers over four years — 43% of all such injuries during the period.
    The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division is investigating potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
    If during the course of an investigation OSHA (or any other gov. entity) have findings of unethical operation it is their responsibility to contact the government entity that monitors the departments of such violations. It appears from this article that was what has taken place and the investigations have followed and are being conducted as per protocol.

  • http://msn mimidunn

    OSHA has outlived its usefullness in on site inspections. A bookeeping error whether intentional or not does not put workers at risk. OSHA has nothing to do with how much a person is paid or what their rent costs are. Where OSHA is concerned you are guilty and have to prove that you are innocent. Time to review the effectiveness and need for any agency with an acronym need to be reviewed for need and relevance. They have become collection and revenue agencies.


advertisement



advertisement

Recent Popular Articles